Advanced
Dan Romero@dwr.eth
1/4/2024

If we had an opt-in "read receipt" mode, a la Instagram Stories or group chats, for casts, would you turn it on?

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Katherine@keccers.eth
1/4/2024

no thanks!

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Max Jackson : MXJXN@tokenart.eth
1/4/2024

I don't know it seems a little intrusive from the reader perspective. I don't want people thinking I saw their content and didn't care about it because I didn't like or engage. I would on the other hand like a more accurate count of how many views the cast has gotten

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
welter.eth@fun
1/4/2024

no i dont like read receipts

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Linda Xie@linda
1/4/2024

No

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
1/4/2024

I wouldn’t no.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
​woj — q/dau@woj.eth
1/4/2024

also no

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Alex Bruno@alex
1/4/2024

Nope

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
miguelito@mc
1/4/2024

No I would not

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Jeff Feiwell@hyper
1/4/2024

love this

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Cyber Shakti @cybershakti
1/4/2024

No way! Let’s not push that crazy behaviour patterns here 😅👐

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
res ipsa ☺︎@resipsa
1/4/2024

no— i haven’t found the obsession with attention via Instagram stories to be particularly healthy (not to say i’m immune). i also like the idea that casts are launched into the infinite expanse that is the whole internet waiting for the serendipitous traveler to discover. read receipts feel local and limiting.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
ted (not lasso)@ted
1/4/2024

no, most people don’t leverage it in a healthy way and it ends up being a toxic feature that affects people negatively.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
rish@rish
1/4/2024

would use for group chats -- not sure an option is needed there tbh for individual 1:1 chats: - iMessage does it in a way that each user opts in independently of others - WhatsApp makes it reciprocal where if you turn off yours, you can't see read status from others I prefer the WhatsApp approach for 1:1s

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
accountless.eth@accountless.eth
1/4/2024

no

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Mantej Rajpal@mantej.eth
1/4/2024

I would not

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Thumbs Up@thumbsup.eth
1/4/2024

I’m always in favour of opt-in rather than opt-out. I don’t think too much about read receipts. Kind of like them as long as no one involved ascribes any assumptions to a lack of response. To me that same set of assumptions can come alongside a long pause with no read receipt. It’s behaviour/compulsion issue imo

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Ethan666.eth@ethan666
1/4/2024

You could always test it

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
1/4/2024

yes, embrace a high trust society

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
1/4/2024

Ship it but hand it over to hatecast it fits their brand better

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
BrightFutureGuy 🔮@bfg
1/4/2024

No - intrusive to reader

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
1/4/2024

I would like to sweep to the left to go back instead of clicking the arrow tbh 👉👈

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Thiago Brezinski@thiagobrez
1/4/2024

No, promotes anxiety in a platform where we dont need messenger-level of realtime responses

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Javad@best
1/4/2024

Yes, but on the condition that the audience can be muted and edited

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
1/4/2024

read receipts one of my least favorite things tbh

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Papajams@papa
1/4/2024

🙅🏾‍♂️

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
maurelian - q/dau@maurelian
1/4/2024

no thanks, I don't want that cognitive overhead when scrolling here.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
josh@u
1/4/2024

I'd prefer anonymous view count to see if the casts are at least reaching eyeballs

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Tayyab - d/acc@tayyab
1/4/2024

Like a “who read this cast”? Eh, I’m okay not knowing.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
kbc - q/dau@kbc
1/4/2024

No

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Nicholas Charriere@pushix
1/4/2024

No

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Ruj89@ruj89
1/4/2024

No, but... Polls?

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Brad Barrish@bradbarrish
1/4/2024

Not having it is one of the many reasons I currently love FC. A feature like that encourages and rewards performant and largely negative behavior.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
payton@payton
1/5/2024

no. feels too invasive

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
1/5/2024

would love that if group chats in dms wouldn't use it in any other scenario

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Bethany - countessellis.eth@ellis
1/5/2024

Yes.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Rafi 🍋@rafi
1/5/2024

Please no

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Maxbrain Capital@viybz
1/5/2024

Yeah very useful at times. Opt-in is a great idea.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
vincent@pixel
1/5/2024

No please

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
[USER STEEN]@usersteen.eth
1/5/2024

Probably not but I'm curious to hear arguments favoring this feature

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
1/5/2024

Hmm my product head: What problem does this solve? This creates problems for me. The only thing read receipts do for me are make me feel guilty for not answering people more quickly. 🤔

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Brais.eth (🥝)@chi
1/5/2024

Of course no. Is this a game sponsored by THeSpyStore? Whats next, share location? (Hope we don't have it already xD)

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Caden@cbxm
1/5/2024

nope.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
1/5/2024

No. I don't want people to be able to see what I'm up to unless I actually post something.

Warpcast
In reply to @dwr.eth
Rakshita Philip@awkquarian.eth
1/5/2024

No

Warpcast