Advanced
In reply to @gabrielayuso.eth
10/1/2023

Channels are an implementation of FIP-2 in the protocol.

In reply to @ccarella.eth
tldr (tim reilly)@tldr
10/1/2023

Why handling this on the protocol level and not the client level @dwr.eth ?

In reply to @ccarella.eth
GabrielAyuso.eth ⌐◨-◨@gabrielayuso.eth
10/1/2023

Right but FIP-2 just maps to a URI not a named channel. Those are two different things right? There could be N "screens" channels each one pointing at a different URI. Is the channel name enforced or mapped somewhere?