Advanced
Surveycaster@survey
7/3/2023

How do you feel about the rapid rate of newly onboarded users? 1. Great, go faster! 2. Good, but let's monitor quality 3. Neutral 4. Negative, quality is lower 5. I'm one of them, happy to be here! Question by @colin-

In reply to @survey
Surveycaster@survey
7/3/2023

When submitting your vote: ✅ put your option # first ✅ add additional comments after your chosen # 👁 follow me to see results

In reply to @survey
Colin Johnson@colin-
7/3/2023

2. Loving the energy, let’s harness it properly

In reply to @survey
filos.tez@filos
7/3/2023

1 It’s the first time I see such “traffic” and engagement I newly launched services like this

In reply to @survey
bradq ⌐◨-◨@bradq
7/3/2023

2 - Love seeing all the new people. Don't necessarily need to monitor quality, but don't need to go faster either. If people want to come, bring 'em in and let's welcome and onboard them.

In reply to @survey
dawufi@dawufi
7/3/2023

1 it's not broken enough yet to really know what the limit is

In reply to @survey
shukudai.dayo.eth 🌹☀️@shukudaidayo
7/3/2023

1, I'm sure the current problems are fixable, and it's good to capitalize on Twitter's recent drama

In reply to @survey
MRB@mrb
7/3/2023

Yeah my answer is 2. All web3 people needs chance to use all future things, in my opinion :)

In reply to @survey
Ben Adamsky@ba
7/3/2023

2 we don’t need heavy gatekeeping, we need to prevent airdrop farmers from spam and we need a slightly stronger algo to keep feeds clean on clients. What we really need is more people interacting with the protocol.

In reply to @survey
misha de ridder 🪨@mdr
7/3/2023

2 love the fresh energy. no real need to monitor quality, but just take care not to break it. and if there’s momentum, like this weekend, profit from it. ✨ there is of course also the risk of opening up too late.

In reply to @survey
Jeremy Boscolo|seattlecrypto.eth@jeremyboscolo
7/3/2023

2 - I love seeing all the new people, but I think that sometimes it's more important to grow strategically rather than lightning fast.

In reply to @survey
Joe Tamponi @joetamponi
7/3/2023

2, not monitor quality exactly, but just keep the eyes open to avoid bots and weird stuff. This whole new thing looks so refreshing

In reply to @survey
GabrielAyuso.eth ⌐◨-◨@gabrielayuso
7/4/2023

2

In reply to @survey
kmacb.eth 🍌🥝🧃@kmacbeth
7/4/2023

1

In reply to @survey
7/4/2023

2, but perhaps the "monitoring" process can be via channels (which need to be gated) or similar where quality is determined by each sub-community.

In reply to @survey
m_j_r@m-j-r
7/4/2023

2 userbase is going to get inevitably wild, so this is just the beginning stages. also, some network effects remain undiscovered, so better to have some forcing function for quality before quantity.

In reply to @survey
web3d3v | sonsOfCrypto.com@web3d3v
7/4/2023

1 LFG

In reply to @survey
SydneyJason@sydneyjason
7/4/2023

2 FC has been interesting and civil so far…let’s keep it that way 😉

In reply to @survey
j4ck • icebreaker@j4ck
7/4/2023

2

In reply to @survey
Britt Kim@brittkim
7/4/2023

Where are the 5s at? In what dark alleys did they get lost?

In reply to @survey
androolloyd.eth | 🦇 🔊@androolloyd
7/4/2023

1. Gotta go fast.

In reply to @survey
aydin@ay
7/4/2023

5 Def happy to be here, but still believe the quality of content should be monitored and ensured to be hq