How do you feel about the rapid rate of newly onboarded users? 1. Great, go faster! 2. Good, but let's monitor quality 3. Neutral 4. Negative, quality is lower 5. I'm one of them, happy to be here! Question by @colin-
When submitting your vote: ✅ put your option # first ✅ add additional comments after your chosen # 👁 follow me to see results
1 It’s the first time I see such “traffic” and engagement I newly launched services like this
2 - Love seeing all the new people. Don't necessarily need to monitor quality, but don't need to go faster either. If people want to come, bring 'em in and let's welcome and onboard them.
1, I'm sure the current problems are fixable, and it's good to capitalize on Twitter's recent drama
Yeah my answer is 2. All web3 people needs chance to use all future things, in my opinion :)
2 we don’t need heavy gatekeeping, we need to prevent airdrop farmers from spam and we need a slightly stronger algo to keep feeds clean on clients. What we really need is more people interacting with the protocol.
2 love the fresh energy. no real need to monitor quality, but just take care not to break it. and if there’s momentum, like this weekend, profit from it. ✨ there is of course also the risk of opening up too late.
2 - I love seeing all the new people, but I think that sometimes it's more important to grow strategically rather than lightning fast.
2, not monitor quality exactly, but just keep the eyes open to avoid bots and weird stuff. This whole new thing looks so refreshing
2, but perhaps the "monitoring" process can be via channels (which need to be gated) or similar where quality is determined by each sub-community.
2 userbase is going to get inevitably wild, so this is just the beginning stages. also, some network effects remain undiscovered, so better to have some forcing function for quality before quantity.
5 Def happy to be here, but still believe the quality of content should be monitored and ensured to be hq