pre-candidate idea for propdates 2.0, with @six shout out to @wilsoncusack @seneca for the incentives idea thoughts ?
It seems like your goal is increase adoption or usage right? Have propdate users :: and especially those not using it :: provided any feedback on what would be best for the roadmap? For example, is markdown really a concern? Or does it have to do with gas fees?
supportive! what’s the planned time commitment from you both?
would you consider streaming the funds? i want to explore setting precedent for streaming so we can be more comfortable making bets where there is execution risk example: you find out after 2 months that this is not pulling your interest anymore so we cancel the stream
3 mos makes more sense to me. 2 feels short, 4 feels long for how early the experiment is. aside from seeing the ind time commitment on the prop, roles would be nice too. assuming you're FE/founder role.. i'm curious what onion would be taking on. ^ an exercise in good prop structure / setting precedent
Thanks for working on a better update process. I’m tired of searching the forbidden forest 🌳
Hey Martin, any thoughts on adding the builder (receiver of funds) to be able to update the proposals? Cheers