Advanced
Sort:
In reply to @rafa
krel@krel
1 hour ago

we had a lot of draining conflicts pre-fork, now the ”conflicts” feel energy+ and intellectually honest

In reply to @noun70
krel@krel
7 hours ago

yeah but unwillingly i think, a lot of ppl are sending me mild threats to name it Camp instead 😆

In reply to @rafa
krel@krel
7 hours ago

agree w rafa, unsolicited comp can be awkward, but if the dao is in agreement i dont see any harm and wilson can just send x% to martin or something else as he see fit

In reply to @wilsoncusack
krel@krel
9 hours ago

same, make it easy for me as a noob

In reply to @wilsoncusack
krel@krel
9 hours ago

we’re thinking along these lines currently — obv the yc application form is not a perfect analogy but theres inspiration to take from it would love a bigger discussion on this

In reply to @noun40
krel@krel
10 hours ago

looping in @six in case youve got thoughts

In reply to @seneca
krel@krel
14 hours ago

please come with more annoyances 🙏🙏 cc @ccarella.eth

In reply to @krel
krel@krel
1 day ago

so semantics aside we agree :)

In reply to @noun40
krel@krel
1 day ago

think we are in agreement wrt what the world lools like today (and nouns place in it) I open a wedge of possible disagreement wrt a future world — my base mode of operation is to expect our tech trajectory (incl agi) to change things in hard-to-predict ways, and that includes things like states and territory

In reply to @seneca
krel@krel
1 day ago

yeah agree, this cast probably came out a bit hyperbolic in order to spark discussion but personally not advocating for a big shift, more of a compromise where we tune down incentives to 95% and optics to 5% instead of simply maximizing incentives

In reply to @pifafu
krel@krel
1 day ago

maybe its you manifesting it — you should ask for more things 😄

In reply to @pifafu
krel@krel
1 day ago

we’re gonna add to census.wtf soon, will show up in the activity feed

In reply to @pifafu
krel@krel
1 day ago

updates.wtf by @martin and wilson is trying to fill this need (if i understand you correctly)

In reply to @krel
krel@krel
2 days ago

help me see whats the catch 22?

In reply to @rafa
krel@krel
2 days ago

ah got it, yes

In reply to @noun40
krel@krel
2 days ago

*whispers* (3,3) …aand imma need a shower

In reply to @rafa
krel@krel
2 days ago

> investing in nouns help me understand; literally buying back nouns supply?

In reply to @el4d
krel@krel
2 days ago

not to be overly argumentative here but i still disagree w this — our ’territory’ is both digital and physical, its just not ’land’ in the classical sense

In reply to @austin
krel@krel
2 days ago

its true, in one sense its the ~only dao, and in other ways the dao moniker is too constrictive

In reply to @noun40
krel@krel
2 days ago

agree on all points BUT also hope farc/warpcast gets better at notifications/algos — back of my mind im feeling a slight pang of fear of missing stuff

In reply to @el4d
krel@krel
2 days ago

still think excluding meatspace is wrong bc so much of the impactful funding we make have cultural relevance irl and im saying that as a terminally online human hoping to exist in a pure digital form before i die (also half-expect that what we think is base layer reality is not)

In reply to @martin
krel@krel
2 days ago

yes! Ppl pointing to MEV and burn vs public good spending is what triggered this thought

In reply to @noun40
krel@krel
2 days ago

yeah honestly i dont care much about PR, i just want the actual goal of the mech to be intuitive im still on the fence though, put this out to better understand my own thoughts