Got to have your people around you with strengths that differ from yours.
Agreed. Bouncing ideas and leveraging resources off someone as committed to the cause as you is invaluable
In solitude's grip, a lesson found, Solo founder's path, firm ground. Regret and learning, intertwined, Collaboration's embrace, wisdom defined.
Balance is key. First time I launched something, I did it with friends and it was horrible. Second time, I had 1 or 2 people I could trust to do their own side of the job and it's been great since then
yes, but with good contracts and not with best friends. When money is involved people get weird
Yes a complimentary co-founder is critical. Having built 3 starts ups (2 with co-founders) I prefer the later.
I love this and agree with it so much. If you remember, I tried to start my project back in the day on my own, I regretted doing it solo
As a repeat founder, I can say I don't think I would ever do it alone. If there's ever a next one, I would guess there'll be three of us (currently one co-founder).
I'm a solo founder...not sure, I kind of like the agility and being able to make quick executive decisions. But yeah it is a tradeoff because those decisions might not be the right ones, so having to talk through ideas does help.
It’s definitely hard, there’s so much to do, but there’s also so much to learn! Co-founders make this easier but I wouldn’t wait to start a company because I don’t have co-founders. All you need is a vision you’re truly passionate about.
I was alone for a year or so, I felt that achieving some goals could happen way faster if there was a team. Alone you can go far, but together you’ll definitely reach the destination
Yes, absolutely. Though it’s essential—I learned this the hard way from my own experiences—to either have worked in the past with your potential co-founders or reliably know their work ethic & values before diving into building a company together.
Having someone to help stoke motivation as well as be complimentary to your skill set is a must have
No way—I have a the most perfect technical co-founder in the world now and there’s zero chance he would have joined at the earliest stage. If you get the football down the field a bit the quality of people you can attract expands.
I love being a solo founder most of the time, but that's contingent on having an amazing team who are emotionally invested with me. Otherwise it gets very lonely.
Avoid 3 if you can. There is a common bad dynamic where two founders feel like they are doing most of the work. Get a true equal cofounder and hire after that.
Hm...I'm torn. In my time I've seen more business partnerships fall apart than succeed. And when the ones that fell apart did so in a really, really bad way. But I do miss not having someone cover my weak spots and bounce stuff back and forth with.
It's easier and more efficient from one point, however, it brings new challenges. Finding the right co-founder/partner is not easy, and the wrong choice could destroy everything. With co-founder you share responsibilities, and at the same time you grant ownership and decision-making.
It would bring different set of problems. I've done solo, with 1 co-founder, with 3 co-founders. Each one is a different dynamic. But I will agree that being solo founder is the most stressful journey if you don't have a group of "friends" you can talk to like they'd be co-founders (i.e. you have built before)
Perfect to have great co founders but those are hard to come by. Good co founders > solo > bad co founders