the correct way to respond to a peer-reviewed meta-study is a newer or larger peer-reviewed meta-study otherwise, you're just pushing your opinion to not appear wrong sometimes you're wrong, and adults usually admit and move on but you can't you go to the list of muted users enjoy unrestricted uv and consequences!
You were wrong to say "100% of the good parts go through sunscreen". You posted a meta study that showed you were wrong. The meta study doesn't disagree with my point of view, as the focus on vitamin D is stupid because you can get it through other means Bye
must they be wrong and you be right? I personally agree with @loracle.eth ‘s view and believe that some sun exposure without sunscreen is good each day. so, why must they admit to something that they have an opinion on, that others share, just for you to assume the position of right?