A blockchain's transaction capacity is equal to the capacity of its L1 plus the capacity of all L2s under its security.
What is the incentive to pay for Eth’s security in perpetuity, assuming the L2 can gather significant assets?
If an L2 gains a lot of usage and TVL, what incentive does it have to keep using and paying for ETH’s security rather than forking ETH to create its own L1 that is secured by its own token. This new L1 might have worse security properties but this seems like a trade off some may choose to make