Advanced
9/16/2023

I abstained from Prop 37 because I’m in it. I’m in it because I want to be supportive of this effort if this is what people want. However I would vote No, don’t think it’s necessary or a good use of resources and agree with the No votes with reason. We should be funding builders. It’s not rocket science.

In reply to @ccarella.eth
Leighton@lay2000lbs
9/16/2023

Did you share views with your co-community before voting started? I don’t understand the logic of being an integral part of a vote you don’t support.

In reply to @ccarella.eth
Deniz 🧿@deniz
9/16/2023

Thanks for being so transparent. I voted yes, but after yesterday's space on Aburra, I wished I voted no. Note to myself: don't vote immediately! 😅

In reply to @ccarella.eth
​woj@woj.eth
9/16/2023

appreciate your voice — i will vote now as well as much as i like the whole crew in the proposal, i feel like purple doesn't have a budget big enough for: - frequent voting - hiring a team thus a "no" from me, and a silent "yes" for a new prop house style round

In reply to @ccarella.eth
Connor McCormick 🥝/🫦@nor
9/16/2023

Would be better imo to retrofund a rebrand.

In reply to @ccarella.eth
Cameron Armstrong@cameron
9/16/2023

Honestly Chris this feels a bit like an overreaction to my cast this morning. There were more than a few opportunities to express this synchronously and asynchronously before the last day of voting. Why wait until now to say anything? https://warpcast.com/cameron/0x3529a7

In reply to @ccarella.eth
caz.eth@caz.eth
9/16/2023

This sounds like unnecessary use of funds. A DAO shouldn’t need strategy docs for “alignment”. If you want alignment, convince people to vote as you want. But the DAO shouldn’t be funding a small group to do that.

In reply to @ccarella.eth
[USER STEEN]@usersteen.eth
9/18/2023

why put your name on an initiative you are decidedly against?