I’ve been reading “The age of surveillance capitalism” and the author posits that once social networks start censoring users, they become responsible for the moderation of the platform Today tech CEOs testified at Congress and it seems that majority of the senators want *higher* moderation on these platforms
Did you watch any of the testimony? I couldn’t believe my eyes. Among many eye popping moments, they got Mark Zuckerberg into a struggle session with parents of children who died as consequence of activities on social media. I did not come away with any more clarity on my position than when i started 🙈
My q to the philosophy channel is how do you build an uncensored social platform at scale when there is harm such as CP, sextortion, scams, bots etc. In this context harm is subjective. I don’t mean harm = illegal. CP is illegal, sending 1000 $DEGEN and getting 10k back is a scam but not illegal. They are both bad.
