Haha, fair. Admittedly I think I’m lost on exactly what that would look like. 🤣 If you had to pick one, is the concern: (1) the concept of this exercise in general, or (2) the idea of some amount of capital being provided to incentivize it being conducted?
The concept of granting capital for it before value has been demonstrated is my concern. If you did a mini sprint pro bono, that resulted in a recommendation Purple took, then asking for funds to continue makes a ton of sense to me. It's been derisked from a risk/reward standpoint.
Do I have some tacit consent to answer this (my notifis are firing lol)? ~14% of the treasury going to 5 members that aren't proliferating seems wrong to me. Would down scope this to Values and see if that sticks. Done as retroactive grant.