There might be a way to do this with embedded URLs You can provide the raw text content via an OG tag and clients can parse and render it online Let me think more on this
All hubs follow the exact same logic and store the same state (sort of like Ethereum nodes) So the limit is global
It’s actually worse if split across many casts because of repeated metadata. But the storage limit is specified to users as a number of casts instead of a number of bytes, since the former is easier to reason about
Can’t do that unfortunately because of storage limits. You could do what jam does, which is to put part of the context into a cast and then hyperlink to a page with the full message
Casts can’t be unlimited length unfortunately, and I think splitting it into many casts would be a clunky UX for users
i can pick up 74kg too they must not be very strong in ireland
An oldie, but goodie https://karpathy.medium.com/software-2-0-a64152b37c35
There was a beta , but we discovered some issues and decided to rewrite the code before shipping
tbd on exact mechanics, but in the short term i don't expect it to be a significant amount of revenue, more of a spam prevention mechanism. long term, if the money became significant, we'd likely invest in development that reduces the cost of running a hub or figure out other ways to incentive hub operation
it's definitely possible! not on warpcast's immediate roadmap, but would be a great entrypoint for a specialized app
This is the guy who sold his company to *checks notes* A very successful social network based on sub groups that’s much bigger than anything he has built
FC subdomains will be user.farcaster.xyz while ens names will be user.eth You can tag FC names with @user for convenience
We're rapidly approaching this timeline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_of_Gods
Today's dev call had a bunch of great topics, including: - Follows (Links) - ENS Support - Channels And an ASMR performance from @dwr. Don't miss it. https://youtu.be/xns0LCCj1eg
i'm pretty sure thats default nouns behavior (required votes is a percentage of supply) and @billzh already has a proposal to reduce that so anyone can propose
people use social networks for one or more of these three reasons - status, belonging or entertainment i don't think assets or ideology are a useful frame to think about why people want to be social