My feed is full of what appears to be damage control about a hypothetical outrage about state pruning that I see none of. That's an interesting phenomenon. Makes sense to me that storage isn't free/eternal.
Yeah I call that the holy trinity. Lots of ways to do it, and it's always great.
More importantly, even if some new token standard allowed this, that does nothing to prevent attackers from using an older standard. Token rejection must be at the user agent level, it can never be enforced in someone else’s memory.
Oh, and you can do that pattern on MetaMask desktop today using the Push protocol snap for the notification, and wallet_watchAsset for adding the asset to the wallet. https://snaps.metamask.io/snap/npm/push-v1/
Ercs? You mean token? Let’s please not abbreviate erc-20 to erc 😅 I know it sounds crazy but what if rando tokens weren’t assumed to be detected by the wallet? Cuts off spam at the root, just requires an extra consent action to subscribe to notifications.
Or what if you had to consent to participate?
It actually takes extra effort to *not* boil the ocean, so maybe work that into your metaphor lexicon.
Agreed. Next time maybe consider using: https://github.com/danfinlay/eip712-codegen
https://x.com/danfinlay/status/1703466395584082342?s=46
Yeah I’m a long time fan of safe’s module system. I’d say their extensible contract account has been held back by a lack of an extensible wallet front-end to match it with, and snaps will let all of those SCWs explore a much higher velocity ecosystem.
Talked Snaps on @banklesshq: http://podcast.banklesshq.com/why-metamask-snaps-is-a-big-deal-with-co-founder-dan-finiay
I think @banklesshq this Friday is going to be good.
You can watch the talk by @m0nt0y4 at Permissionless premiering MetaMask Snaps here!: https://youtu.be/pnawbASw93Y?t=11641
I'll be celebrating the snaps launch on twitch here, going rogue/solo, inviting some people who helped make it all happen! https://www.twitch.tv/danfinlay3
How are you going to unlock an extensible protocol without an extensible client? https://x.com/MetaMask/status/1701585470512095636?s=20 If you have MetaMask extension installed today, check out snaps.metamask.io to install some new security providers & protocols!
How are you going to unlock an extensible protocol without an extensible client? https://x.com/MetaMask/status/1701585470512095636?s=20 If you have MetaMask extension installed today, check out snaps.metamask.io to install some new security providers & protocols!
Had you given T Mobile any special recovery instructions? I understand they will accept them (like a special password to provide to reset). Am curious if the social engineering bypassed any special notes.
Oh I think it’s fundamentally flawed to initiate every interaction by disclosing your entire portfolio, and everyone is racing to reinvent that mistake the hardest.
I understand there’s a movement to refer to a cocktail composed of four equal parts as “perfect”, and I’d like to publicly advise against depriving a domain of its craft with this kind of verbiage. That is all.
Delegations do give you a way to share funds between wallets without exchanging keys, but doesn’t solve the issue for EOAs. For EOAs we need a new protocol change like EIP 3074 or EIP 5003.
I didn’t see another approach that addressed the need for users to be able to have authority over their own account authorization upgrade policy. Plus it even works for eoas. So it seems like the simplest fully baked SBT proposal imo.