I'm not sure the team building FC should also be building WC (and if built by protocol team should be bare minimum to demonstrate protocol functionality). Protocol is only successful if it proliferates among devs independent of the protocol. .
Maybe a difference here but I'm not sure anything that went vc funding route will be happy not dominating market share. Incentives don't align to protocol/public goods.
these protocols have taken a VC-ish approach to building, which inherently becomes a winner takes all fight. I think nostr has done best as a true protocol layer and best positioned imo.
will happen when the characters enter public domain. Then we might get some interesting superhero films.
Don't each of them have their own minting contracts and there's an nft.mints table that stores that and Dune queries for reference (i think)
"armed society is a polite society"
+ tokenomics are 🔥🔥 for the project builders + Their investment + LPs get to dump on market instantly
Interesting background with 0x. Where do you think that project is at the moment? Where do you think it sits compared to its competitors?
Agree. Better than LastPass though (which I migrated from following the hack)
think it largely misses motivation. they're editorializing, not practicing journalism. who's going to determine what context is important to add?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I put no stock in IQ assessments or using that as a measurement. But interesting if that's been the case. I'm not sure if it's an "intelligence" issue and more broad social/behavioral regression. Certainly very reactionary to progress.
Absolutely no reason to believe any of this is altruistic or remotely true
largely subjective and anecdotal measurement? Looking at the critical race theory conversation, I'd say there is absolutely a segment of the US that is unable to do critical thinking.