If they sit on the board and have the shares, yes. In this case, they're uni is essentially shares and they're exercising their corporate control. This is just corporate governance, with the usual players holding biggest influence, and some retail get to play but don't necessarily get influence
well Twitter doesn't have on-chain utility. Original post a reaction to him referring to a couple of apps as web2 but web3-enabled (in this case literally means login with metamask). But other than that, nothing about these products are on-chain... So are they web3 apps?
More thinking that social media operates at bigger scale and pace than newsletters. Can't see anybody wanting to be prompted for feedback after every unfollow.
directionally correct. awards ceremonies aren't barometers of art but the business machinery around art.
So far, has been a playground for the wealthy. Power and wealth dynamics have been replicated, not removed. Financialization of everything has, so far, replicated worst traits of influencer/status social media.
Oh. Maybe Coinbase if they can turn it around. Can see them wanting to consolidate all types of entry points from fiat world. If I think about AOL creating apps that allow anybody to utilize protocols, Coinbase (or someone like them) seems an obvious parallel.
People used to recommend Airr but it's still in testflight (after 2 years) and still buggy afaik
Did you originally mean AOL as in a relic of an era? That's what I meant.
Thought will admit, as someone not on Twitter and not really following news, it was something on the peripheral and barely registered in my day to day.
1) one of those events that captures immediate social network imagination and easily meme-able. 2) ridiculous fear-mongering and attempts to paint current white house as impotent (and media is generally sympathetic to this kind of positioning)