Advanced
Sort:
In reply to @jacob
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
8 days ago

omg i’ve been tinkering here since 2014, YES

elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
10 days ago

when reality asserts itself and central points of failure flop - the path becomes clear Decentralize great timing with EIP-4337 making the future of institutional and consumer adoption brighter than ever

In reply to @keccers
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
12 days ago

no offense, but gross

In reply to @slowcrypto
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
12 days ago

love him - the lab in london carries his stuff

In reply to @seanwince
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
17 days ago

for the love of god, NFT technology is not synonymous with collectable speculators' markets

In reply to @depatchedmode
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
17 days ago

Oh my god I love this Working with a cadre in NYC on a ZK/Trustless Design Hackathon, let's absolutely talk

In reply to @alexanderchopan
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
17 days ago

chanel was also a Nazi cheerleader but yes, control your variables

In reply to @depatchedmode
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
17 days ago

tell us more?

In reply to @mme
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
17 days ago

it's usually the same volume as large, shaped and priced to make large options more appealing

In reply to @alice
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
17 days ago

It was a while ago, but there's a PDF copy outlining a similar debate they'd had even earlier -- the later one must have just updated some references to real world examples https://intelligence.org/files/AIFoomDebate.pdf

In reply to @mk
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
17 days ago

I saw him lose a debate to Robin Hanson on this, ironically at Jane Street Capital, when I was in college ~2012

In reply to @cryptpal
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
18 days ago

so great @HyperspaceOrg 0014 3/6 β¬›πŸŸ¨β¬›β¬›β¬› πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨πŸŸ©β¬›β¬› 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Verify this game result is valid zkwordle.com/proof/undefined #zkvm #nanochain #ETHDenver

In reply to @brileigh
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
23 days ago

I got the Mark Levinsons instead - not sure how I feel

In reply to @elizabeth
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
23 days ago

back in 2017, I worked on a mutual aid DAO looking to replace insurance & workplace benefits itself [look up 'DISC' Max Borders] - we just have a ways to go before we can do that competently and consistently at scale

In reply to @kmacbeth
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
23 days ago

The insurance is standard, nationally accepted Pet Insurance under our licensed LLC -- the DAO is for policyholding pet parents to vote on the proceeds of that business, namely on which animal welfare causes to fund for Phase I As we divest & sufficiently decentralize, the mechanics can expand

In reply to @kmacbeth
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
24 days ago

I did say the brand. Please link to codebase, if you have it, interested.

In reply to @kmacbeth
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
24 days ago

I already said - but yeah, the whole thing screams vaporware skinned to appeal to people that can't actually compute facts over feelings πŸ¦… πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸŽ†

In reply to @drguy
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
24 days ago

Always check the privacy policy.

In reply to @mbar
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
24 days ago

they've been around over 10 years already

In reply to @maurerbot
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
24 days ago

the branding is idiotic tf does 'family first' have to do with doc mgmt

In reply to @sam
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
25 days ago

that religious mystic was NOT working on LaMDA, stop interviewing frightened lay people

In reply to @morereese
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
25 days ago

uh, you mean the A in DAO? and the automation being delivered via smart contracts is why the D in DAO is valid now, is the decentralization sufficient? almost never - as yet

In reply to @n
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
26 days ago

not sure about that second claim

In reply to @zrs
elizabeth.ai@elizabeth
26 days ago

Carhartt makes an espresso machine??