Yeah, but when you look at the numbers… That’s not hyperbole. “…40% of animals and 34% of plants in the United States are at risk of extinction, while 41% of ecosystems are facing collapse.” That’s rightfully shocking.
And FWIW, I didn’t think your blog post title was clickbaity hyperbole, either. GPT-3 was out for over 2 years before people got all excited about it through ChatGPT. ML isn’t magic. It’s just fancy math.
risk? How is risk quantified and qualified? Aren‘t we all at risk of dying and isn‘t every animal/species eventually headed for extinction? To me it is edge lording that is probably very boring or less sensational.